I went into
Everything Bad Is Good For You with preconceived ideas, but with an open mind - or, at least, a willingness to let the book open my mind. (See December 17) The author didn't convince me of his argument that popular culture is making society smarter. He presented some interesting ideas within his argument, however.
Steven Johnson, the author, made an interesting point that the thrill of video games comes from learning how to play them as you go along - in exploring new environments and discovering what is in the next level. He points to the millions of dollars spent on guide books and hint books that people typically need to complete a video games as evidence that video games are not brain numbing activities. That's true enough. But I say to Mr. Johnson: How is that really different than playing chess or bridge, which society was doing long before video games? It is possible, I suppose, to reach the end of a game of chess without a guidebook. But without a guidebook or, better yet, a teacher, all you can ever hope to do is reach the end of a chess game. Once you've finished a video game, the guidebook becomes useless, and your skill in future games comes from knowing what's in the next level. There are people who spend their entire lives learning how to play chess well.
The author almost had me convinced when he pointed out that the plot of a typical episode of
The Sopranos is more complex than a typical episode of
Hill Street Blues, which was more complex than
Starsky and Hutch, which was more complex than
Dragnet. Then, for some reason, he killed his own argument (for me, anyway) by pointing out that the multi-layered, multi-character style of stories that
Hill Street Blues pioneered had actually been used in soap operas before it. That, and the quotes by Steve Allen about how bland early television was, suggests to me that society had been sophisticated enough for a show like
The Sopranos long ago, but that the fault was with the networks who didn't trust the audience.
Besides, I wonder, how does the plot of
Der Ring des Nibelungen compare in complexity to an episode of
The Sopranos?
And I didn't buy his argument at all that the fact that people discuss the strategy of
Fear Factor in chatrooms as evidence of the sophistication of modern culture.
The book obviously made me think, even if it didn't convince me.