There is a story in the latest issue of The Sun in which the author wonders about the oxymoronic name "The Lone Ranger and Tonto." How can someone be considered lone, wrote the author, when he's accompanied by a sidekick? The author wonders if this is because Tonto is non-European, and therefore not a true person.
That's a nice thought, but I think the author needs to brush up on his American folklore. The point is not that The Lone Ranger is alone, it's that he's a lone Ranger. The story is that a group of Texas Rangers, including John Reid and his brother, were ambushed by a gang of outlaws. The outlaws killed all of the Texas Rangers - or so they thought. John Reid didn't die in the ambush. He was the lone survivor - the lone surviving Ranger - the lone Ranger. John Reid made a mask from his dead brother's vest, and called himself the Lone Ranger, in order to hide his true identity, since everyone thought he'd been killed by outlaws. Somehow, he figured it was easier for him to fight injustice that way. John Reid was The Lone Ranger long before he met Tonto.
That's a nice thought, but I think the author needs to brush up on his American folklore. The point is not that The Lone Ranger is alone, it's that he's a lone Ranger. The story is that a group of Texas Rangers, including John Reid and his brother, were ambushed by a gang of outlaws. The outlaws killed all of the Texas Rangers - or so they thought. John Reid didn't die in the ambush. He was the lone survivor - the lone surviving Ranger - the lone Ranger. John Reid made a mask from his dead brother's vest, and called himself the Lone Ranger, in order to hide his true identity, since everyone thought he'd been killed by outlaws. Somehow, he figured it was easier for him to fight injustice that way. John Reid was The Lone Ranger long before he met Tonto.