I like the film Vanilla Sky. A lot of people don't share that opinion with me, I know, and that's fine. (Vanilla Sky is in my DVD collection.) Vanilla Sky is a remake, and I've been curious to see the original, Mexican, version, Abre Los Ojos. I haven't been able to find Abre Los Ojos at Broadway Video until yesterday, because I'd been making three mistakes.
First, I hadn't asked any of the employees there if they have the film. There are several reasons for that, and none of them are that I was afraid to ask. The main reason is that Broadway Video's Mexican film section is small enough that I could see with "mis ojos" that Abre Los Ojos was not on the shelf.
Second, Abre Los Ojos is a Spanish film - not a Mexican film. I learned that on Internet Movie Database yesterday. I'd been looking in the wrong section.
Third, I'd been looking under A for Abre Los Ojos. I stumbled upon it in the Spanish movie section yesterday under O for Open Your Eyes (Abre Los Ojos), which is kind of strange, since the DVD isn't dubbed into English.
I watched Abre Los Ojos last night. It was the second time in recent memory that I liked an American remake better than the original version. (The first being The Ring versus Ringu.) I felt that Vanilla Sky developed its characters better. The "Seven Dwarfs" in Vanilla Sky were scary, and therefore it was easy to buy the concept that they might be behind a conspiracy. We never get to meet "The Partners" in Abre Los Ojos, I got no sense of what type of people they were, and I really couldn't tell how realistic the conspiracy claims were.
I felt that Vanilla Sky was one time that a bigger budget made things better. The special effects made the question of reality much more vivid, and made LE seem more believable as a forward-thinking, futuristic corporation.
In Abre Los Ojos, the "other woman" was a two-night stand, a stranger without a last name. In Vanilla Sky, she's a long-time friend that both the male leads care about, and that somehow made her hurt feelings more painful.
This may sound kind of shallow, but I felt that Tom Cruise made a better lead character. Tom Cruise is a superstar actor, famous for his handsome face. I found myself caring more about his facial disfigurement than I did about Eduardo Noriega's. - No, that's not right. I realized in mid-sentence that it was more than star quality. In Vanilla Sky, David comes across as a more charismatic person, with big connections, throwing big parties - a person whose lifestyle depends on his good looks. In Abre Los Ojos, César is rich, we're told, but I never saw him with a lot of friends or followers. (Plus, David's injuries are portrayed as more extensive than César's - effecting his movement and well-being as well as his looks.)
What I found especially interesting was the idea that Penélope Cruz played the same character in both films, and yet she played the character differently each time. In Abre Los Ojos, Sofía is a serious, almost tragic, person, deeply effected by César's accident. In Vanilla Sky, she's much lighter, more flirty, and somehow not so clinging to David. I think that part of it is that in Vanilla Sky, Penélope Cruz is speaking English as a second language, with a heavy accent, and she comes across as more exotic - someone beyond David's world, and in his eyes, a mystery to uncover, a rare prize to acquire.
I think that Abre Los Ojos is a well-made film, but I do think Vanilla Sky is better.
First, I hadn't asked any of the employees there if they have the film. There are several reasons for that, and none of them are that I was afraid to ask. The main reason is that Broadway Video's Mexican film section is small enough that I could see with "mis ojos" that Abre Los Ojos was not on the shelf.
Second, Abre Los Ojos is a Spanish film - not a Mexican film. I learned that on Internet Movie Database yesterday. I'd been looking in the wrong section.
Third, I'd been looking under A for Abre Los Ojos. I stumbled upon it in the Spanish movie section yesterday under O for Open Your Eyes (Abre Los Ojos), which is kind of strange, since the DVD isn't dubbed into English.
I watched Abre Los Ojos last night. It was the second time in recent memory that I liked an American remake better than the original version. (The first being The Ring versus Ringu.) I felt that Vanilla Sky developed its characters better. The "Seven Dwarfs" in Vanilla Sky were scary, and therefore it was easy to buy the concept that they might be behind a conspiracy. We never get to meet "The Partners" in Abre Los Ojos, I got no sense of what type of people they were, and I really couldn't tell how realistic the conspiracy claims were.
I felt that Vanilla Sky was one time that a bigger budget made things better. The special effects made the question of reality much more vivid, and made LE seem more believable as a forward-thinking, futuristic corporation.
In Abre Los Ojos, the "other woman" was a two-night stand, a stranger without a last name. In Vanilla Sky, she's a long-time friend that both the male leads care about, and that somehow made her hurt feelings more painful.
This may sound kind of shallow, but I felt that Tom Cruise made a better lead character. Tom Cruise is a superstar actor, famous for his handsome face. I found myself caring more about his facial disfigurement than I did about Eduardo Noriega's. - No, that's not right. I realized in mid-sentence that it was more than star quality. In Vanilla Sky, David comes across as a more charismatic person, with big connections, throwing big parties - a person whose lifestyle depends on his good looks. In Abre Los Ojos, César is rich, we're told, but I never saw him with a lot of friends or followers. (Plus, David's injuries are portrayed as more extensive than César's - effecting his movement and well-being as well as his looks.)
What I found especially interesting was the idea that Penélope Cruz played the same character in both films, and yet she played the character differently each time. In Abre Los Ojos, Sofía is a serious, almost tragic, person, deeply effected by César's accident. In Vanilla Sky, she's much lighter, more flirty, and somehow not so clinging to David. I think that part of it is that in Vanilla Sky, Penélope Cruz is speaking English as a second language, with a heavy accent, and she comes across as more exotic - someone beyond David's world, and in his eyes, a mystery to uncover, a rare prize to acquire.
I think that Abre Los Ojos is a well-made film, but I do think Vanilla Sky is better.